United States | Lexington

The vice-presidential debate was surprisingly cordial

Its high-minded tone worked to J.D. Vance’s advantage

illustration shows J.D. Vance and Michael Waltz shaking hands awkwardly
Illustration: David Simonds

Why did Tim Walz have to go and spoil things? For almost the entire vice-presidential debate on October 1st Americans were transported back to a different era in their politics, a time when candidates tried to seem—maybe even were—respectful of each other, open to compromise, mindful of their own weaknesses and intent on solving big problems. It was soothing, at times even informative, a bit dull in a good way. No one bragged about the size of their crowds, much less of their genitalia, or even called anyone else by a demeaning nickname.

Explore more

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Vice to virtue”

From the October 5th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

US Vice President Kamala Harris looks shocked.

Could an “October surprise” upset America’s election?

What last-minute developments might portend for the race

Illustration of blue legs crossing a red dotted line.

Donald Trump is preparing an assault on America’s immigration system

The third in our series of policy briefs


Illustration of scissors cutting a Tax paper in half. The scissors are red and the paper is blue.

What America’s presidential election means for taxes

The second in our series of policy briefs


The Supreme Court begins another contentious term

Guns, vapes, online porn and health care for transgender youth dot the docket

What America’s presidential election means for world trade

The first in a series of eight concise briefs on the consequences of the 2024 election

Checks and Balance newsletter: gender politics in the election 

Both parties are telling very different stories about gender