United States | Tariffic

What America’s presidential election means for world trade

The first in a series of eight concise briefs on the consequences of the 2024 election

A reach stacker carries a container at the Packer Avenue Marine Terminal in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Photograph: Getty Images
|WASHINGTON, DC

In the 1990s presidential hopefuls fought over how much America should open itself up to commerce with other countries. Nowadays, the trade debate revolves around how much America should close itself off. Donald Trump is unquestionably the more radical of the two candidates, with a vision for tariffs that would turn the clock back nearly a century on economic strategy. Kamala Harris is less extreme but still sees a world in which America is best served by soft protectionism, featuring subsidies for favoured industries.

Explore more

Discover more

US Vice President Kamala Harris looks shocked.

Could an “October surprise” upset America’s election?

What last-minute developments might portend for the race

Illustration of blue legs crossing a red dotted line.

Donald Trump is preparing an assault on America’s immigration system

The third in our series of policy briefs


Illustration of scissors cutting a Tax paper in half. The scissors are red and the paper is blue.

What America’s presidential election means for taxes

The second in our series of policy briefs


The Supreme Court begins another contentious term

Guns, vapes, online porn and health care for transgender youth dot the docket

Checks and Balance newsletter: gender politics in the election 

Both parties are telling very different stories about gender

Many Americans can decide their own policies. What will they choose?

Three issues will dominate state ballot measures in November