The Economist explains

Why is Washington, DC not a state?

Residents of America’s capital lack representation in Congress and full control over their local government. Calls for statehood are growing louder

ON A LIST of American states and territories ordered by area, Washington, DC is at the very bottom: nearly 10,000 Washingtons could fit into Alaska. Reorder that list by federal taxes paid per person, and Washington finishes first. But unlike residents of the 50 states, Washingtonians are unrepresented in Congress. They have no senators, and just one non-voting House delegate—Eleanor Holmes Norton, who has held the job for 30 years. Washingtonians could not vote in presidential elections until 1964. Not until 1974 were they permitted to elect their own municipal government, and the city still cannot pass laws or even an annual budget without Congressional review. Its residents are tiring of this arrangement. In a referendum in 2016, 85% of them said they wanted statehood. On March 22nd the House Committee on Oversight and Reform will hold a hearing on the idea. Why have Washingtonians been stateless for so long?

Discover more

What is Kamala Harris’s record as a prosecutor?

Republicans say she was soft on crime. Progressives say she was too harsh

Can Donald Trump use songs against a musician’s will?

Many stars have complained, and some have filed lawsuits


What is the Fed’s preferred inflation measure?

The PCE gauge is broader and more dynamic than its better-known relative, the CPI


Will Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris matter?

Celebrity endorsements are unlikely to change voters’ minds. But they may boost turnout

Donald Trump says immigrants are eating Springfield’s pets. What?

He repeated the bizarre—and false—claim in his presidential debate against Kamala Harris

Who will lead Britain’s Conservative Party?

Here are the four candidates vying for the daunting job