Whose right to bear arms?
The Supreme Court hears a crucial case
GUN laws are a matter of life and death, reckoned both groups of protesters outside the Supreme Court on March 18th. One side argued that sensible curbs on gun ownership save lives. The other side retorted that if you outlaw guns, only criminals will carry them. Plus the police, of course, but gun-lovers don't find that terribly reassuring. “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away,” read one placard.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Whose right to bear arms?”
From the March 22nd 2008 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionDiscover more
Could an “October surprise” upset America’s election?
What last-minute developments might portend for the race
Donald Trump is preparing an assault on America’s immigration system
The third in our series of policy briefs
What America’s presidential election means for taxes
The second in our series of policy briefs
The Supreme Court begins another contentious term
Guns, vapes, online porn and health care for transgender youth dot the docket
What America’s presidential election means for world trade
The first in a series of eight concise briefs on the consequences of the 2024 election
Checks and Balance newsletter: gender politics in the election
Both parties are telling very different stories about gender