This year’s Nobel prizes prompt soul-searching among economists
The rise of randomised controlled trials looks to some like a retreat from the biggest questions
NOBEL PRIZES are usually given in recognition of ideas that are already more or less guaranteed a legacy. But occasionally they prompt as much debate as admiration. This year’s economics award, given to Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer, was unusual both for the recency of the contributions it recognised and the relative youth of the recipients. (For a review of “Good Economics for Hard Times”, by Mr Banerjee and Ms Duflo, see Books and arts section.) Intentionally or not, it has inflamed arguments about the direction of the profession.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Works in progress”
Finance & economics November 23rd 2019
- Big Tech takes aim at the low-profit retail-banking industry
- Pope Francis promised to clean up the Vatican’s murky finances
- Excess Asian savings are weighing on global interest rates
- How machine learning is revolutionising market intelligence
- Firms that analyse climate risks are the latest hot property
- What next for Europe’s banking union?
- Why currency traders are serene even as Western politics gets messy
- This year’s Nobel prizes prompt soul-searching among economists
Discover more
Could war in the Gulf push oil to $100 a barrel?
Missiles are flying over a region that supplies a third of the world’s crude
How bond investors soured on France
They now regard the euro zone’s second-largest economy as riskier than Spain
Can Andrea Orcel, Europe’s star banker, create a super-bank?
An interview with the boss of UniCredit
Why economic warfare nearly always misses its target
There is no such thing as a strategic commodity
A tonne of public debt is never made public
New research suggests governments routinely hide their borrowing
Xi Jinping’s belated stimulus has reset the mood in Chinese markets
But can the buying frenzy last?