The idea of reparations for slavery is morally appealing but flawed
Democrats should drop it
MITCH MCCONNELL is not known for his views on racial justice. But when asked last week whether he thought African-Americans should receive restitution for slavery and the decades of lawful discrimination that followed it, the Republican Senate leader’s response was sound. He was against the idea, he said, in part for practical reasons—for how would the recipients of compensation be selected? He also objected in principle: if African-Americans received reparations, what about the other victims of discrimination, including America’s many “waves of immigrants”? Continued, incremental improvements in the lives of black Americans seemed a more credible response to “our original sin”, said Mr McConnell. “We’ve elected an African-American president. I think we’re always a work in progress in this country.”
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Slave wages”
United States June 29th 2019
- A jail in Denver offers some lessons for criminal-justice reformers
- Can American states slow global warming on their own?
- The president stands accused of rape, again
- Will transparent pricing make America’s health care cheaper?
- Where female athletes are more popular than male ones
- The idea of reparations for slavery is morally appealing but flawed
Discover more
Could an “October surprise” upset America’s election?
What last-minute developments might portend for the race
Donald Trump is preparing an assault on America’s immigration system
The third in our series of policy briefs
What America’s presidential election means for taxes
The second in our series of policy briefs
The Supreme Court begins another contentious term
Guns, vapes, online porn and health care for transgender youth dot the docket
What America’s presidential election means for world trade
The first in a series of eight concise briefs on the consequences of the 2024 election
Checks and Balance newsletter: gender politics in the election
Both parties are telling very different stories about gender