Should Britons’ health be considered a national asset?
Persuading the Treasury that sickness is anti-growth
WES STREETING, the health secretary, likes to make a snappy prediction. If health spending keeps going up, he says, then Britain will end up like “the National Health Service with a little country attached to it”. It does not have to be this way, a number of think-tanks close to Labour insist. Instead of viewing health as a cost, they argue, Britain should think of it as an asset. The idea of investing in better health fits snugly with Mr Streeting’s plans to shift the focus of the NHS from hospitals to community care, from sickness to prevention. But it could also act as a supplement to boost Britain’s growth.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “A healthy balance-sheet”
Britain September 28th 2024
- What is Britain’s Labour government for?
- Britain’s budget choices are not as bad as the government says
- Much keener on Trump, less sure about Charles III
- Why did Mohamed Al Fayed escape scrutiny?
- The self-help book began in the land of the stiff upper lip
- Should Britons’ health be considered a national asset?
- Inside the chaos machine of British politics
Discover more
The story of one NHS operation
And what it says about how to improve the productivity of Britain’s health service
The Sue Gray saga casts doubt on Sir Keir Starmer’s managerial chops
Faith in the prime minister’s technocratic credentials has been tested
Britain has agreed to cede the Chagos Islands to Mauritius
The Chagossians seem set to benefit less than China
Ukrainians are settling down in Britain. That creates a problem
A tricky decision for the new Labour government
Gigafactories and dashed dreams: the parable of Blyth
What one port town says about the British economy