Let them wed
There is no compelling reason to exclude homosexual couples from marriage, and several compelling reasons to include them
MARRIAGE may be for the ages—but it changes by the year. And never, perhaps, has it changed as quickly as since the 1960s. In western law, wives are now equal rather than subordinate partners; interracial marriage is now widely accepted both in statute and in society; marital failure itself, rather than the fault of one partner, may be grounds for a split. With change, alas, has come strain. In the 25 years from 1960, divorce rates soared throughout the west—more than sextupled in Britain, where divorce appears inevitable for the world's most celebrated marriage, that of Charles and Diana Windsor. Struggling to keep law apace with reality, Britain's Tory government is even now advancing another marriage reform, seeking, on the whole sensibly, to make quick or impulsive divorce harder but no-fault divorce easier.
Discover more
Introducing Opinion, our latest newsletter
Get leaders, columns, guest essays and readers’ letters in one place
We’re hiring a senior producer
Join The Economist’s video department
Pint-sized news quiz
Have you been following the headlines?
Espresso, our daily news app, is now free for students
We are also using AI-powered translations to reach new audiences
Week two of our caption competition
The second of our weekly challenges for readers
Introducing our caption competition
A weekly challenge for our readers