How the Trump administration is reshaping Medicaid
Republican-led states are using waivers to impose work requirements for the first time ever
AMERICAN lawmakers are acutely afraid of rewarding the loafing poor. For that reason, Congress has set strict work requirements on federal food assistance and cash welfare. The Trump administration is now steadily doing the same for Medicaid, as America’s health-insurance programme for the poor is known. On January 11th the Centres of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a memo inviting states to apply for waivers that would include “work and community engagement requirements” on the theory that this would both improve health and help families “rise out of poverty and attain independence”. Ten states, all Republican-led, quickly took up the offer. Michigan, another Republican-controlled state, has contemplated a waiver of its own which would impose some of the strictest work requirements yet seen. The impetus is less financial than moral—an attempt to sort the deserving poor from the chaff.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Will work for health care”
United States May 19th 2018
- Donald Trump wants tough justice—with one exception
- California’s primaries are the most unpredictable in America
- The Supreme Court lets Americans lose money in a new way
- How the Trump administration is reshaping Medicaid
- Missouri’s governor is likely to be impeached
- Democrats have plenty of anger, but few good ideas
Discover more
Could an “October surprise” upset America’s election?
What last-minute developments might portend for the race
Donald Trump is preparing an assault on America’s immigration system
The third in our series of policy briefs
What America’s presidential election means for taxes
The second in our series of policy briefs
The Supreme Court begins another contentious term
Guns, vapes, online porn and health care for transgender youth dot the docket
What America’s presidential election means for world trade
The first in a series of eight concise briefs on the consequences of the 2024 election
Checks and Balance newsletter: gender politics in the election
Both parties are telling very different stories about gender