United States | Working for it

How the Trump administration is reshaping Medicaid

Republican-led states are using waivers to impose work requirements for the first time ever

|WASHINGTON, DC

AMERICAN lawmakers are acutely afraid of rewarding the loafing poor. For that reason, Congress has set strict work requirements on federal food assistance and cash welfare. The Trump administration is now steadily doing the same for Medicaid, as America’s health-insurance programme for the poor is known. On January 11th the Centres of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a memo inviting states to apply for waivers that would include “work and community engagement requirements” on the theory that this would both improve health and help families “rise out of poverty and attain independence”. Ten states, all Republican-led, quickly took up the offer. Michigan, another Republican-controlled state, has contemplated a waiver of its own which would impose some of the strictest work requirements yet seen. The impetus is less financial than moral—an attempt to sort the deserving poor from the chaff.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Will work for health care”

Gaza: There is a better way

From the May 19th 2018 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

US Vice President Kamala Harris looks shocked.

Could an “October surprise” upset America’s election?

What last-minute developments might portend for the race

Illustration of blue legs crossing a red dotted line.

Donald Trump is preparing an assault on America’s immigration system

The third in our series of policy briefs


Illustration of scissors cutting a Tax paper in half. The scissors are red and the paper is blue.

What America’s presidential election means for taxes

The second in our series of policy briefs


The Supreme Court begins another contentious term

Guns, vapes, online porn and health care for transgender youth dot the docket

What America’s presidential election means for world trade

The first in a series of eight concise briefs on the consequences of the 2024 election

Checks and Balance newsletter: gender politics in the election 

Both parties are telling very different stories about gender