Briefing | Measuring the 1%

Economists are rethinking the numbers on inequality

An academic disagreement has big real-world implications

OVER A DECADE before thousands of protesters gathered in Zuccotti Park in New York in 2011, a little-known researcher in France sat down to write about income inequality in a new way. “The focus of our study consists in comparing the evolution of the incomes of the top 10%, the top 1%, the top 0.5%, and so on,” Thomas Piketty wrote in a paper in 1998. With his long-term co-author, Emmanuel Saez, Mr Piketty pioneered the use of tax data over survey data, thereby doing a better job of capturing the incomes of the richest. He revealed that “the 1%” had made out like bandits at the expense of “the 99%”. His research gave Occupy Wall Street its vocabulary.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Measuring the 1%”

Inequality illusions

From the November 30th 2019 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Demonstrators wave flags and placards at a pro-Palestinian protest

Has the war in Gaza radicalised young Palestinians?

After Gaza, how will the Palestinians try to build their state?

Israeli soldiers stand next to a group of Orthodox men

A year on, Israeli society is divided about the lessons of October 7th

Hawks and doves, religious and secular, right and left—all the old cleavages are resurfacing


Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile system intercepts rockets fired by Iran

The bloodshed in the Middle East is fast expanding

Israel seems certain to retaliate to Iran’s missile attack


What Hamas misunderstood about the Middle East

A war meant to draw in the militant group’s allies has instead left them battered

After the decapitation of Hizbullah, Iran could race for a nuclear bomb

The embattled clerical regime might feel the need for stronger deterrence

Ukraine is on the defensive, militarily, economically and diplomatically

Russian advances, fatigue among its allies and political divisions at home leave it in a bind