The Economist explains

Donald Trump says immigrants are eating Springfield’s pets. What?

He repeated the bizarre—and false—claim in his presidential debate against Kamala Harris

Former President Trump and Vice President Harris during the Presidential Debate is displayed on a TV screen
Photograph: Getty Images

WHEN DONALD TRUMP uttered the word “Springfield” 33 minutes into the American presidential debate on September 10th, David Muir, the co-moderator, was prepared. In that small Ohio town, Mr Trump declared, illegal immigrants are “eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the pets of the people who live there”. Mr Muir promptly replied that, according to Springfield’s city manager, there were no credible reports of pet-eating. The former president’s claim must have struck many viewers as bizarre. But lots of Mr Trump’s fans were primed for it: the allegation had been circulating in right-wing circles on social media, boosted by Elon Musk, the owner of X. How did the town come to be at the centre of a right-wing conspiracy theory?

Explore more

Discover more

What is Kamala Harris’s record as a prosecutor?

Republicans say she was soft on crime. Progressives say she was too harsh

Collage of Donald Trump and Jack White

Can Donald Trump use songs against a musician’s will?

Many stars have complained, and some have filed lawsuits


A general view of the U.S. Federal Reserve Marriner S. Eccles building, in Washington, DC, USA - with a warm sunlight casting shadows.

What is the Fed’s preferred inflation measure?

The PCE gauge is broader and more dynamic than its better-known relative, the CPI


Will Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris matter?

Celebrity endorsements are unlikely to change voters’ minds. But they may boost turnout

Who will lead Britain’s Conservative Party?

Here are the four candidates vying for the daunting job

When can parents be held responsible for their children’s crimes?

Mass shootings by young assailants are raising the question