Finance & economics | Free exchange

An American sovereign-wealth fund is a risky idea

Donald Trump’s latest proposal has worryingly broad support

illustration of a U.S. dollar bill depicted as a flag waving on a flagpole. The dollar bill shows the familiar image of George Washington and standard markings of a one-dollar note
Illustration: Álvaro Bernis

Not long ago America’s main concern with sovereign-wealth funds was how to regulate these large pools of money controlled by foreign governments. Now, seemingly overnight, the hot new idea in Washington, DC, is that America should join the club. It is easy to understand the allure. A well-managed SWF can, in theory, let the government direct more cash towards its strategic aims, without—if returns are strong—the need to raise taxes. In practice, achieving this balance is difficult. In America a SWF looks like a risky solution to a problem that does not truly exist.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Presidential proposal”

From the September 14th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Could war in the Gulf push oil to $100 a barrel?

Missiles are flying over a region that supplies a third of the world’s crude

FRANCE-TRADITION-LEISURE-TOURISM

How bond investors soured on France

They now regard the euro zone’s second-largest economy as riskier than Spain



Why economic warfare nearly always misses its target

There is no such thing as a strategic commodity

A tonne of public debt is never made public

New research suggests governments routinely hide their borrowing