An American sovereign-wealth fund is a risky idea
Donald Trump’s latest proposal has worryingly broad support
Not long ago America’s main concern with sovereign-wealth funds was how to regulate these large pools of money controlled by foreign governments. Now, seemingly overnight, the hot new idea in Washington, DC, is that America should join the club. It is easy to understand the allure. A well-managed SWF can, in theory, let the government direct more cash towards its strategic aims, without—if returns are strong—the need to raise taxes. In practice, achieving this balance is difficult. In America a SWF looks like a risky solution to a problem that does not truly exist.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Presidential proposal”
Finance & economics September 14th 2024
- Can anything spark Europe’s economy back to life?
- Norway’s weak currency presents a mystery
- Strangely, America’s companies will soon face higher interest rates
- Can bonds keep beating stocks?
- China’s government is surprisingly redistributive
- The IMF has a protest problem
- Why orange juice has never been more expensive
- An American sovereign-wealth fund is a risky idea
Discover more
Could war in the Gulf push oil to $100 a barrel?
Missiles are flying over a region that supplies a third of the world’s crude
How bond investors soured on France
They now regard the euro zone’s second-largest economy as riskier than Spain
Can Andrea Orcel, Europe’s star banker, create a super-bank?
An interview with the boss of UniCredit
Why economic warfare nearly always misses its target
There is no such thing as a strategic commodity
A tonne of public debt is never made public
New research suggests governments routinely hide their borrowing
Xi Jinping’s belated stimulus has reset the mood in Chinese markets
But can the buying frenzy last?